Nassau: 366 North Broadway Suite 410 Jericho, NY 11753
Suffolk: 445 Broad Hollow Road Suite 25 Melville, NY 11747
Call Us Toll-Free: (888) 572-0861 Email: email@example.com
An employee of the federal government whose medical condition prevents him or her from continuing to work may seek a disability retirement under the Federal Employees Retirement System (“FERS”). FERS interacts with Social Security Disability (“SSD”) in several ways. For example, FERS benefits cannot begin until an SDD application has been filed, and there is some offsetting of benefits. If the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) approves a claimant’s application for disability retirement under FERS it should help the SSD application process.
To obtain SSD benefits, a claimant usually must demonstrate an inability to perform past work. If a claimant receives disability retirement benefits under FERS, then it means that the OPM determined that the claimant was unable to perform the duties of his or her past work. Decisions from other agencies, such as the OPM, are not binding on the Social Security Administration (“SSA”). However, under an SSA ruling, the decisions of other agencies are entitled to considerable weight.
A former mail handler retained me a couple of weeks before he was scheduled to appear for a hearing before an SSA Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). My prehearing submission included the mail handler’s OPM decision approving disability retirement benefits under FERS. I argued that OPM is in a better position to determine if the claimant could do his past work than the SSA. Therefore, the only remaining issue for the ALJ would have been was whether the mail handler could perform any other type of work. However, because the claimant was 50 years old, and a mail handler has no transferable skills to sedentary work, a SSA medical – vocational rule required the ALJ to find the claimant disabled. Accordingly, the ALJ canceled the hearing, and approved the claimant’s SSD benefits.
Had the claimant retained me sooner, then I could have used the same arguments in my prehearing submission that the ALJ accepted for an on-the-record (“OTR”) request. The OTR would have avoided most of the time that the claimant spent waiting for his hearing date.Previous Next
DISCLAIMER This website provides general information on disability law topics as a public service. Information is intended to be as accurate and current as possible, but should not be relied on as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is created by viewing or using the content on this website. Each legal problem is different, and past performance does not guarantee future results. You should not act on any of the information contained in this site without first consulting legal counsel, which is why readers are advised to seek experienced legal representation in connection with disability related issues. Our Internet links are not associated with us, and we do not guarantee the accuracy of, any information contained in any link. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.
Copyright © 2023, Law Offices of Jeffrey Delott
Site Powered By: WebDesignYou