Saturday, January 23rd, 2021
  • HOME
  • FREE PHONE CONSULTATION
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT LAWYER

www.iwantmydisability.com

Nassau: 366 North Broadway Suite 410 Jericho, NY 11753
Suffolk: 445 Broad Hollow Road Suite 25 Melville, NY 11747
Call Us Toll-Free: (888) 572-0861   Email: jd@iwantmydisability.com

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • Disability Attorney
    • FREE PHONE CONSULTATION
  • RESOURCES
    • Useful Links
    • Docket Search
    • Court Decisions
    • Newsday Editorials
      • Editorial 8-25-11
      • Editorial 8-13-12
  • DISABILITY CLAIM FAQ
  • SERVICES
    • Applying For Disability Benefits
    • Disability Appeals
    • Negotiation
    • Disability Claim Litigation
    • Post Approval Supervision
  • CIGNA
    • CIGNA RSA
    • ABC News Expose
    • CIGNA Blog Entries
    • CIGNA Decisions
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • CONTACT

cc

Contact Us

Practice Areas

Social Security Disability

Disability Insurance Policies

Long Term Disability Plans

Union Disability Pension

NYS and NYC Disability Retirement

Federal Disability Retirement

Free Phone Consultation

Free Phone Consultation

 

Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice.

Bookmark and Share

Follow us on Facebook

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Getting SSD Even If You Can Work

Receiving Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits is dependent upon the interaction between medical and vocational evidence. There are circumstances where a person can receive SSD benefits even if physically able to work, because of adverse vocational factors.

I represent a 57 year old who immigrated here from Haiti after graduating high school, and spent his last 26 years working for New York City as an automobile mechanic. The claimant was treated by an orthopedic surgeon for knee, bilateral shoulder and lumbar back injuries. The doctor said that the claimant could do some sedentary work, but his findings and conclusions showed the Plaintiff lacked the ability to perform a full range of sedentary work. Nonetheless, I was able to get the claimant’s application approved without a hearing based on the vocational evidence.

If the relevant past work of a person over the age of 55 was not sedentary, and there are no skills that are transferable to sedentary work, then that person is entitled to SSD benefits even if physically capable of sedentary work. I provided the hearing office with case law holding that there are no transferable skills for an automobile mechanic, which is medium to heavy work. Therefore, even if the medical evidence were interpreted as showing the claimant had a sedentary work ability, I had demonstrated that the claimant would still be entitled to SSD benefits. An attorney advisor agreed, and issued a fully favorable decision approving the claimant’s application without having to wait for a hearing.

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Health Insurance For Children

For many disabled parents, the loss of working income makes it difficulty to afford health insurance for children. After a year long court battle to recover child’s benefits in connection with a Social Security Disability case, I received a Notice of Award for child’s benefits that included a note about insurance for children through the Children’s Health Insurance Program (“CHIP”).

Each State’s CHIP provides health insurance to uninsured, low-income children 18 years of age or younger, including those who are homeless. You can call 1-877-KIDS-NOW (1-877-543-7669) to find out how to apply, or go to http://cms.hhs.gov/schip for more information.

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Health Insurance For Children

For many disabled parents, the loss of working income makes it difficulty to afford health insurance for children. After a year long court battle to recover child’s benefits in connection with a Social Security Disability case, I received a Notice of Award for child’s benefits that included a note about insurance for children through the Children’s Health Insurance Program (“CHIP”).

Each State’s CHIP provides health insurance to uninsured, low-income children 18 years of age or younger, including those who are homeless. You can call 1-877-KIDS-NOW (1-877-543-7669) to find out how to apply, or go to http://cms.hhs.gov/schip for more information.

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Settling With CIGNA

Like many insurance companies, CIGNA’s initial decisions to terminate long term disability (“LTD”) benefits can be quite indefensible. Unfortunately, most people are unable to persuade CIGNA to reverse an adverse decision, and need an attorney’s assistance.

I was retained by a former paramedic officer from Arizona to represent him in connection with his LTD claim with CIGNA. After discussing the claim with the representative who terminated the LTD benefits, I was advised that CIGNA would not reverse its decision. Therefore, my client asked me to file a lawsuit against CIGNA.

The medical and vocational evidence weighed heavily in favor of finding that the claimant remained disabled under CIGNA’s policy, and I drafted a 33 page Complaint. However, before filing the action, I provided a copy of the Complaint to a senior level CIGNA representative to review. While initially believing that CIGNA’s decision appeared appropriate, after discussing the Complaint with me and considering the Complaint in full detail, the senior representative decided to reverse CIGNA’s decision to terminate benefits.

If I had litigated the case, as requested by the claimant, I am confident that the court would have reversed CIGNA’s decision, which could have resulted in a substantial amount of additional attorney fees. However, by persuading the claimant to consider allowing CIGNA to review the Complaint before actually filing suit it resulted in his LTD benefits being restored more quickly.

It obviously makes sense to retain an attorney experienced in disability litigation when seeking LTD benefits. Familiarity with the minutia of the legal issues relating to claims involving LTD benefits enabled me to persuade CIGNA to reverse its decision without having to litigate, which enabled the claimant to receive his benefits much sooner than he expected.

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Avoiding An Improper Consultative Exam

In the vast majority of cases, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) insists that disability claimants attend a consultative examination (“CE”), which is performed by a doctor selected by the SSA. However, the SSA rules and regulations require that the claimant’s treating doctor perform a CE subject to a few exceptions. The exception that the SSA usually relies upon as grounds for a CE is that the treating doctor’s opinion or report contains conflicts, gaps or inconsistencies. Before the SSA or an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) can ask a claimant to attend a CE by a non-treating doctor on the grounds that the treating doctor’s opinion or report contains conflicts, gaps or inconsistencies, the ALJ must first recontact the treating doctor to explain the perceived conflict, gap or inconsistency.

I represent a former police officer whose arthritis specialist and orthopedist provided reports describing why their patient’s condition prevented him from working in any capacity. ALJ Weiss insisted that the officer attend a CE by an “independent” orthopedist because of alleged conflicts and inconsistencies in the medical reports, but I insisted that the ALJ first recontact the treating doctors in accordance with the regulations. ALJ Weiss then denied the officer’s application on the grounds that the officer lacked good cause for refusing to attend the CE.

After filing a complaint in federal court, the SSA admitted that the officer had good cause for refusing to attend the “independent” CE, and that it was improper to penalize the officer for refusing to attend it. The SSA asked the officer to remand the case, and would require the ALJ to recontact the treating doctors to clarify or provide additional information to resolve the perceived conflicts and inconsistencies in their reports. The SSA also agreed that the Appeals Council remand order will direct the ALJ to issue a decision on the merits of the case even if the officer refuses to attend an independent CE without good cause.

The SSA’s remand offer confirms that a treating source is the preferred source for performing a CE. The SSA’s remand offer also confirms that it cannot ask an “independent” doctor to perform a CE unless the treating source is given the chance to explain any alleged conflict, gap or inconsistency. Finally, the SSA’s remand offer shows that a claimant has good cause, and cannot be penalized, for refusing to attend a CE that fails to comply with the SSA’s rules and regulations.

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

Multiple Sclerosis

The best type of evidence for a Social Security Disability (“SSD”) claim is evidence that shows the claimant meets a “listed impairment.” If the criteria of a “listing” are met the applicant is presumed to be disabled, and no further medical or vocational development is required to approve SSD benefits.

Multiple Sclerosis (“MS”) is typically treated by a neurologist. Therefore, when applying for SSD benefits based upon MS, the best type of evidence would be an opinion from a neurologist that the claimant meets the criteria under the 11.09 listing for MS.

I represent a 53 year old former secretary and bookkeeper for her husband’s business whose SSD application was approved yesterday, just one month after I submitted a narrative report from her neurologist explaining why the 11.09 criteria were met. The claimant was not even asked to be examined by a Social Security doctor.

The rapid approval was undoubtedly due to the listing opinion from the neurologist. The first thing I always do when analyzing a claim is to determine whether the claimant’s condition can meet or equal a listing, and then securing the necessary records and reports from the treating doctor. If a hearing has already been scheduled, showing that a claimant meets a listing is important because it makes it significantly more difficult for an Administrative Law Judge to deny the claim, or for the denial to be sustained on appeal.

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Protective Filing Dates

When filing a Social Security Disability (“SSD”) application, it is possible to be awarded up to twelve months of retroactive benefits. Since there is a full five month waiting period for SSD benefits, a claimant will not lose potential SSD benefits as long as the application is filed seventeen months after the onset of the disability.

For a variety of reasons many people do not file SSD applications immediately after their disability onset. If there is a possibility of filing an application and the 17 month mark is approaching, the safe thing to do is to seek a protective filing date.

A protective filing date is the date a claimant first contacts the Social Security about filing for SSD benefits. The protective filing date can be used to establish an earlier application date than the date when Social Security actually receives the signed application. A protective filing date can be established by calling the Social Security Administration’s toll free number – 800-772-1213, which eventually leads to a live operator who will take the application. The SSA usually follows up with a letter confirming an appointment. Even if the appointment is cancelled, the letters serves as proof for a protective filing date.

It is important to retain the SSA letter. I received a fully favorable on the record decision today that did not provide the protective filing date. I had reminded the claimant of the importance of the letter, but he misplaced the letter, resulting in a loss of a month’s benefits.

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

SSD Delays

Delays are commonplace when applying for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits. Those delays frequently create “dire need” situations, such as being unable to afford medications, medical treatment, utilities, rent, or mortgage costs. Fortunately, the Social Security Program Operations Manual System permits expediting a claim when dire need circumstances exist.

I advise my clients to write me a letter explaining why their need exceeds that of other claimants, who may be able to pay for their health and housing. I suggest that they provide copies of eviction papers or past dues notices that substantiate their claims. I then provide the letter to the SSA describing how their delays have exacerbated the claimant’s dire need, and cite the relevant rules pertaining to expediting such claims.

I represent a 52 year old teacher who had to apply for food stamps while awaiting a decision on her SSD application. The SSA local office lost the application and demanded a new one. After showing proof that I had submitted the application, I sent a copy of the claimant’s letter stating that she had been approved for food stamps, and asked that the case be expedited as a dire need situation without having to submit a new application. The claimant was approved today for SSD benefits just one month after the dire need letter was submitted.

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Reopening Past SSD Denial

It is common for people to apply for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits more than once. Each new application starts a new date when benefits potentially become payable. What many people don’t realize is that it may be possible to “reopen” a prior application, which can result in the payment of additional benefits.

I represented a 44 year old carpenter who had applied three times, and was proceeding with his third application when he retained me. The oldest application was filed in February 2004, and the latest was filed in July 2007. I requested copies of the prior application files.

After reviewing all of the records, I obtained a report from the claimant’s treating physician that showed the claimant had lacked the ability to work since November 2003. I made a motion to reopen the prior application on the grounds that the report constituted new and material evidence. ALJ Brian Crawley agreed, and issued a fully favorable decision that approved SSD benefits based upon the prior application’s filing date.

The result of the reopening was that the claimant received well over three years of additional SSD benefits. When filing a new application always investigate whether there are grounds for reopening the prior one

Friday, November 6th, 2009

ALJ Strauss’ Reliance On ME Cohen’s Testimony Proves She Is Biased

ALJ Hazel Strauss just issued a decision that proves she is biased against disability claimants. The Appeals Council had reassigned the case to ALJ Strauss from ALJ Seymour Fier on remand. The claimant is a 62 year old Italian woman with a third grade education who had worked as an unskilled sewing machine operator.

ALJ Strauss relied on the testimony of a medical expert (“ME”) from a prior hearing named Theodore Cohen. ME Cohen’s testimony was shown to be so utterly biased against claimants that ALJ Fier ruled that it had to be struck from the record; and therefore, he did not refer to ME Cohen’s anywhere in his 2008 decision. However, without any authority or explanation for doing so, ALJ Strauss based her October 2, 2009 decision on ME Cohen’s testimony.

Since ALJ Strauss knew that she could not use ME Cohen’s testimony because it had been struck from the record, how is it possible to explain her relying upon it? What possible excuse did ALJ Strauss have for using ME Cohen’s testimony, when it was clear from the record’s hearing transcript and ALJ Fier’s 2008 decision that it had been struck?

ALJ Strauss claimed that she reviewed the entire record, which made it abundantly clear that ME Cohen’s testimony had been struck. Therefore, ALJ Strauss cannot cannot claim that it was stupidity or negligence that caused her to rely on ME Cohen’s testimony — ALJ Strauss knew that she was improperly relying on it. ALJ Strauss purposely relied on ME Cohen’s testimony because her preference for denying disability claims inhibited her impartial judgment, which is the American Heritage Dictionary definition for bias.

ALJ Strauss’ will be reversed, although that is little solace to the claimant who now has to wait for the lengthy appeal process.

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

Listed Impairments

The best type of evidence for a Social Security Disability (“SSD”) claim is evidence that shows the claimant meets a “listed impairment.” If the criteria of a “listing” is met the applicant is presumed to be disabled, and no further medical or vocational development is required to approve SSD benefits.

I represent a 59 year old, whose past work was primarily in the security field. I sent the claimant for cognitive testing, which revealed a performance IQ between 60 and 70. I obtained a report from an arthritis specialist indicating that the claimant’s low back pain limited his ability to do full time sedentary work. I argued that those medical records showed the claimant met listing 12.05(C).

The SSA apparently agreed that the claimant met the listing because the application was approved in less than four months. Those familiar with the disability process know that approval within a few months is relatively rare. Medical sources should be asked from the outset for evidence to support a claimant’s meeting listing criteria because such claims are frequently screened for quick approval

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

Multiple Medical Sources

Disability cases are usually a battle of the medical experts with your doctor saying you cannot work while their doctor saying you can. One of the best ways to ensure that your doctor’s opinion will be accepted over the non-treating doctor’s opinion is to have other doctors corroborate your doctor’s opinion.

I represent a 62 year old former Administrative Assistant with various back and foot problems. Instead of simply relying on the opinion of the claimant’s primary treating source, her neurologist, I secured opinions from the claimant’s rheumatologist, family doctor, orthopedist and chiropractor that concurred with the neurologist. Additionally, some investigation revealed that the non-treating doctor was not even board certified. Not surprisingly, the claimant’s application for disability benefits was approved.

While it may have been possible that the claimant could have received disability benefits without the concurring medical opinions, I prefer to stack the deck in the claimant’s favor, and minimize the chances of having to file an appeal. Since claimants normally need disability benefits as soon as possible to replace their lost income, the relatively small investment in time and money to secure the additional medical support should be well worth it.

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Attorney Advisors

In May 2007, the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) announced plans to eliminate the backlog of hearing requests by providing funding to hire additional staff. According to the SSA’s own statistics, in the New York region, the hearing wait was 547 days in May 2007. As of August 2009, the hearing wait had been reduced to 474 days.

Notwithstanding the SSA’s statistics, it is not unusual for a Social Security Disability claimant to have to wait nearly two years before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) hears the case. However, that delay can be avoided by making use of the staff attorneys at hearing offices known as Attorney Advisors. The SSA has extended the Attorney Advisor program to August 2011.

The Attorney Advisor program allows the hearing office attorneys to issue fully favorable on-the-record (“OTR”) decisions, which negates the need for a hearing with an ALJ. Allowing the attorneys to approve the more obvious cases not only expedites those claimants’ benefits, but also enables ALJs to focus on the more complex cases. The best way to show an Attorney Advisor that a case does not require an ALJ is by showing the claimant meets a Medical-Vocational rule or listed impairment criteria that requires a finding of disability. I received a fully favorable OTR decision today from an Attorney Advisor that illustrates this point.

I represent a 59 year old former mason tender and currency trader. I cited a Medical-Vocational rule that required finding him disabled even he were capable of performing sedentary work. The Attorney Advisor accepted the evidence and arguments in support of applying that rule, which made it an obvious case for approval. Instead of waiting 474 days for a hearing, the claimant’s OTR was approved in less than 60 days.

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

Avoiding Consultative Examinations

When applying for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits, the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) virtually always sends a notice stating that the claimant has to be examined by one of its doctors for a Consultative Examination (“CE”). Almost without exception, the CE concludes that the claimant is capable of working, and therefore, the SSA denies the SSD application.

What most applicants don’t realize is that the rules and regulations severely restrict the circumstances where the SSA can require a CE. For example, POMS DI 57540.020 requires the SSA to identify the “essential evidence missing from the file,” and then to request it from the treating source. Similarly, Social Security regulation 20 C.F.R. § 404.1512(f), states that a CE is appropriate only if information the SSA “need(s) is not readily available from the records of your medical treatment source, or we are unable to seek clarification from your medical source;” and 20 C.F.R. § 404.1519a(a)(1) requires the SSA to seek the information from the claimant’s treating source before resorting to a CE. There are many other rules, regulations, and federal court decisions that provide the same.

I always insist that the SSA comply with the rules and regulations regarding CEs. I offer to provide any medical evidence the SSA can specify, and to facilitate a CE by the claimant’s treating doctor. The absence of the CE by the SSA prevents negative evidence from making its way into the file, which delays the application’s approval. I represent a former school superintendent whose SSD application was approved today in only four months. Had I allowed the CE to proceed, then the SSA would have required a hearing to weigh the conflicting opinions.

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

Atypical Parkinson’s

Patients with atypical parkinsonism have some features of Parkinson’s Disease (“PD”) such as tremors at rest, slowness of movement, stiffness, unsteadiness and freezing while walking). However, symptoms of atypical parkinsonism result not only from loss of cells of the substantia nigra as in classic PD, but also from degeneration of cells in other areas of the nervous system. Older patients are more severely affected by atypical parkinsonism and PD in general.

When applying for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits based on atypical parkinsonism, the Medical-Vocational rules should always be reviewed because the claimant is likely to be older than 50. I represent a 59 year old women who taught school for the last 15 years of her career. According to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, teaching is light work, which means it is done primarily while standing and walking. A person who is at least 50 years old, and has only performed light work during the past 15 years must be found disabled under Medical-Vocational Rule 201.04 in the absence of transferable skills – even if capable of performing full time sedentary work.

I was able to have the claimant’s SSD application approved without a hearing, which likely would have required an additional 1.5 to 2 years, by demonstrating how the claimant met Medical-Vocational Rule 201.04. Arguments supporting disability based on the Medical-Vocational Rules or a listed impairment should always be highlighted as they are often screened for quick approval.

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Chondromalacia

You don’t have to be elderly to have disabling arthritis. Chondromalacia is essentially arthritis of the knee. I represent a 39 year old former press operator whose Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits were approved without a hearing.

The claimant retained me after he filed his application for SSD benefits. His application was denied in August on the grounds that the medical evidence failed to show a condition that would prevent him from doing sedentary work. Sedentary work requires lifting 10 pounds, walking and standing about 2 hours a work day, and sitting the remainder of the time.

Last month, I submitted an on-the-record (“OTR”) request for a fully favorable decision. After establishing that chondromalacia is a medially determinable condition, I demonstrated that it reduced the claimant’s functionality to the extent that sedentary work was not possible. The key was securing work assessments from three physicians, two orthopedists and an arthritis specialist, showing that the claimant could not lift 10 pounds, walk and stand for 2 hours a work day, and sit the remainder of the day.

Simply having one physician’s assessment may have sufficed after a hearing to obtain the claimant’s SSD benefits, but probably would not have been enough evidence to succeed via OTR. By successfully using the OTR process, the claimant will not have to wait 18 to 24 months before his hearing would be rescheduled.

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009

Subpoena The SSA Doctor

When you apply for Social Security Disability or Supplemental Security Income benefits, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) will tell you to see its doctor. The SSA calls its doctor a Consultative Examiner (“CE”).

Most of the time the actual exam by the CE is cursory, contains findings that simply are made up, and indicates the claimant can work. The SSA then ignores what the treating doctor says and relies on the CE report to deny the application for disability benefits.

In New York, after the initial denial, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) assigned to your case sends you a hearing notice. Among other things, the notice says you have the right to ask the ALJ to issue a subpoena for people or documents. The SSA regulations and case law provide you with the right to cross examine your CE.

Always request that the ALJ subpoena your CE. The CE will not be able to support most of the findings and conclusions in the CE report. Furthermore, if the ALJ refuses to issue the subpoena, then that denial of due process provides automatic grounds for a new hearing if the ALJ denies your claim. I just received a decision from the Appeals Council that rejected an ALJ’s unfavorable decision for that very reason.

Friday, September 25th, 2009

Prudential Reverses Fibromyalgia STD & LTD Denial

I represent a former banker afflicted with fibromyalgia whose short term disability (“STD”) and long term disability (“LTD”) claims had been denied by Prudential Insurance Company of America. Prudential had based its decision to terminate STD benefits and deny LTD benefits on a so-called independent medical examination (“IME”) by a rheumatologist who does not regularly treat fibromyalgia.

The IME admitted the claimant has fibromyalgia; admitted that fibromyalgia is a pain syndrome, admitted that no objective testing exists for fibromyalgia; admitted that the claimant has a global pain syndrome; admitted that the pain is difficult to measure; and admitted that the claimant’s treatment is appropriate. The only difference between the opinions of Dr. Jason Faller, the claimant’s treating rheumatologist, and the IME, was that the IME stated that because the claimant’s pain was difficult to measure, she had no functional limitation. While the IME may have had difficulty measuring the claimant’s pain, Dr. Faller, as the claimant’s long time treating doctor, did not.

Prudential said that the only evidence of functional impairment was the claimant’s self-reported statements, but failed to identify what else could possibly exist other than Dr. Faller’s finding of severe trigger points. The IME had asserted that the claimant’s complaints were inconsistent with range of motion findings, and that absent atrophy, neurological abnormalities and decreased range of motion, the claimant could not be functionally impaired.

In a very abbreviated nutshell, I pointed out that Social Security Disability cases held that “decreased range of motion and/or sensory impairments are not symptoms of fibromyalgia, and the absence of these non-symptoms thus does not reflect on the presence or severity of fibromyalgia.” Prudential implicitly conceded that while no diagnostic test is applicable for fibromyalgia, making it difficult to measure pain in these individuals, the person in the best position to measure the claimant’s pain was Dr. Faller who had examined her many times over many years. Accordingly, Prudential approved both STD and LTD benefits for the claimant

Friday, September 25th, 2009

ALJ Nisenewitz: Stupid or Biased?

Administrative Law Judge David Nisnewitz (“ALJ”) denied a fibromyalgia claimant’s application for the second time. The first time the Appeals Council rejected the ALJ’s denial because there was no medical evidence contradicting the opinion of the treating rheumatologist. This time, the ALJ relied upon the opinion of a non-examining medical expert (“ME”) to deny the claimant’s application, even though a federal court previously told the ALJ that the testimony of an ME, the lone dissenting physician, “does not constitute substantial evidence to overcome the opinions of the treating physician” that the claimant is disabled.

The ALJ knows from his past cases that he cannot elevate an ME’s opinion over a treating physician’s opinion. Therefore, how is it possible to explain the ALJ’s repeating the same mistake? What possible excuse did the ALJ have for repeating his error, especially since he was reminded in, not one, not two, but three letters that he had been admonished previously for improperly rejecting the opinion of the treating physician in favor of the ME?

The American Heritage Dictionary defines “stupid” as slow to apprehend or dumb, and “bias” as a preference that inhibits impartial judgment. Did the ALJ fail to realize that he was repeating his mistake, despite being reminded in the three letters that elevating an ME’s opinion over a treating physician’s opinion was improper? If so, then it would seem that the ALJ was slow to apprehend the issue, which is the American Heritage Dictionary definition for “stupid”.

Alternatively, the ALJ could have realized that he was repeating his mistake. If so, then it would seem that his preference for denying disability claims inhibited his impartial judgment, which is the American Heritage Dictionary definition for bias. Notably, in a recent Michigan case, another ALJ was accused of bias because his approval rate for disability cases was 41% and 28% in 2005 and 2006. In contrast, it appears that ALJ Nisnewitz’s approval rate was 35% for 2005 and 25% for 2006. The Michigan court also noted there was no evidence of inappropriate comments or animus by the ALJ. On the other hand, Judge Irizarry found ALJ Nisnewitz has displayed both.

It is unlikely that anything will be done about biased ALJs because the courts rely upon the SSA to investigate such matters, and in my experience the SSA evades that responsibility. Despite a court stating that investigating ALJ bias allegations would be appropriate on remand in another case, the SSA has refused to fulfill its duty to investigate the allegations. Instead, the SSA speciously claims that the court directed it to comply with a FOIA request, which simply was not the case.

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

LTD & Health Insurance

Some companies provide their employees with group disability and health coverage. Frequently, the long term disability (“LTD”) and the health insurance plans are linked so that if you become disabled under the LTD plan your premium is waived under the health plan. Thus, your health insurance continues while you are disabled. A problem arises when the LTD insurance company wrongfully terminates or denies LTD benefits, which results in a loss of health care coverage.

When you eventually succeed in securing your LTD benefits, you should not forget to seek reimbursement for your health care expenses. Any money paid toward COBRA or for other health insurance premiums should be sought. Similarly, if health insurance lapsed because the premium could not be afforded, your out of pocket costs should be sought. You should not have to pay any more than you would have if your health insurance was not wrongfully terminated or denied.

Sometimes other employee benefits are also linked to your LTD plan. When seeking LTD benefits always make sure that you have copies of a Summary Plan Description for each group benefit plan that covered you while working.

Page 1 of 3123»
Loading
  • 2021 (2)
  • January (2)
    • ALJ Smith Reversed Again
    • Survivor Benefits
  • 2020 (47)
  • December (3)
    • Compassionate Allowance
    • Unum LTD Approval
    • Federal Court Remand
  • November (2)
    • Form Over Substance
    • Superior Service at Melville
  • October (2)
    • Common Sense
    • Patchogue Ineptness Continues
  • September (4)
    • Common Sense
    • Attorney Needed
    • The Right Decision
    • Coincidence or Trend?
  • August (3)
    • Federal Court Win
    • Waiting for SSD
    • State Agency Employee Fraud
  • July (1)
    • Judging Disabilities
  • June (7)
    • Updating Records
    • OTRs
    • Developing The Record
    • WC IME
    • What Was DDS Thinking
    • Updating Records
    • NYS OTDA
  • May (3)
    • Disability Insurance Approvals
    • SSD Backlog
    • COVID-19 Disability
  • April (6)
    • SSD Hearings
    • Some Good News!
    • Medical Consultant C. Levit
    • COVID19 Impacts SSD
    • Prudential Approval
    • CDC's Response to COVID19
  • March (8)
    • Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes
    • COVID19 Bill
    • Kudos to CALJ Wexler
    • COVID19 Repercussions
    • Coronavirus
    • Getting It Right
    • DaTscan
    • Adult Disabled Child
  • February (5)
    • SSD Approved in 1 Week
    • State Agency Doctors
    • SS Benefits in Danger
    • Proposed Changes to SS and Medicare
    • 6 Years for Approval
  • January (3)
    • Harmful Changes to SSD
    • Age & Disability
    • Prudential Disability Rating
  • 2019 (44)
  • December (2)
    • New Opinion Weighing
    • Listing
  • November (2)
    • Peripheral Arterial Disease
    • LTD Doctor Scam
  • October (1)
    • COLA
  • September (7)
    • Exhaustive Hospital Records
    • Expert Interrogatories
    • Surveillance Report
    • SSD Approved in 2 Months
    • Unum Pays
    • Bipolar Disorder
    • “Reserved” to the Commissioner
  • August (6)
    • SSD Approved in 4 Months
    • Videotaping IMA
    • Frontal Lobe Syndrome
    • Fahr's Syndrome
    • Initial SSD Approved
    • Inconsistent, But Favorable Decision
  • July (2)
    • How Slow Is It?
    • Medical Persuasiveness
  • June (2)
    • Meeting a Social Security Listing
    • Help for SS?
  • May (4)
    • NYS OTDA & IMA
    • ALJ “Gets It”
    • SSD Approved in 4 Months
    • Louis Fuchs
  • April (1)
    • Social Media and Disability
  • March (2)
    • LA Times on Trump and Social Security Disability
    • SSA and Facebook
  • February (5)
    • SSD and Working
    • U.S.D.J. Azrack Reverses ALJ
    • Objective Testing
    • U.S.D.J. Amon Reverses ALJ Iwuamadi
    • Proposed SS Rule Hurts
  • January (10)
    • Borderline Age
    • The Wait Is Killing Them
    • IMA
    • Erythromelalgia
    • Limbic Encephalitis
    • Government Shutdown & SS
    • Consussions
    • Migraines
    • Physician Assistants
    • SSA Stay Denied
  • 2018 (55)
  • December (3)
    • SSD After Returning To Work
    • Unum Avoids Trial
    • State Agency Fraud
  • November (3)
    • Ulcerative Colitis
    • How Absenteeism Affects Disability
    • Do You Need A Lawyer To Get SSD?
  • October (6)
    • Advanced Practice Registered Nurses
    • Bipolar Disorder
    • SS Benefits Increase
    • Dysautonomia
    • Young Person Granted OTR
    • Earnings After Onset
  • September (2)
    • Unum Motion To Remand Denied
    • SSA Misinformation
  • August (4)
    • SS Retirement Benefits
    • Pain Management Support
    • Social Security Scam
    • More Trouble for SSD
  • July (5)
    • Recording A CE
    • COPD
    • CE Boondoggle Continues
    • Continuing Disability Review
    • Help for Social Security?
  • June (2)
    • SSD While You Work
    • DDS Summarily Reversed
  • May (1)
    • The Future of Social Security
  • April (7)
    • Patchogue Obstruction
    • Washington Times Article
    • Medical Sources
    • Lourdes Marasigan
    • Lump Sum Settlements
    • Partially Favorable Decisions
    • No Help for SSD Backlogs
  • March (7)
    • Fast SSD Approval
    • Vocational Experts
    • Disability and Medicare
    • IMA Disability Services
    • NYSLERS & SSD
    • Help for SSD Benefits?
    • Vocational Expert
  • February (7)
    • Supporting Records
    • Budget Cuts Increase Wait Times
    • Support Letters
    • SSD For MS
    • Misconceptions About SSD Continue
    • Patchogue Fails Again
    • Myasthenia Gravis
  • January (8)
    • Lupus
    • SSD Delays
    • WC Medical Opinions
    • Government Targets the Disabled
    • Another SSD Myth Busted
    • The Truth About SSD
    • SS Benefits 101
    • Increase in SS Denials
  • 2017 (50)
  • December (11)
    • Best Time to Apply for SS
    • Parkinson's Disease
    • SSA in Crisis
    • SSD Reform Needed
    • Applying for SSD Benefits
    • Headaches
    • Disabling Fibromyalgia
    • Garnishing SS Benefits
    • Nurse Practioners
    • Trump Hurt Disabled Workers
    • Expediting Hearing
  • November (5)
    • Social Security Fraud
    • Congress Can End SSD Backlog
    • Tips for Retirement Benefits
    • Social Security Backlog Continues
    • Income and Disability
  • October (1)
    • Witness Testimony
  • September (3)
    • Free Medical Records for New Yorkers
    • Mental Health Parity Laws
    • OTRs to Reduce Backlog
  • August (3)
    • SSD Hearing Delays
    • Unum Loses
    • SSA Medical Experts
  • July (4)
    • Fast SSD Approvals
    • Video Representation
    • Treating Doctor CE
    • Investigating DDS Doctors
  • June (4)
    • Auxiliary Benefits
    • Work History
    • Prehearing Brief
    • Rule Change
  • May (5)
    • ALJ Kilgannon Reversed
    • Hereditary Angioedema
    • IMA CE
    • RSD Journal
    • Psychotherapy Treatment Records
  • April (3)
    • Unum Rubberstamping Puppets
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Update
    • Consultative Examinations
  • March (3)
    • Discretionary Clauses
    • Pancreatitis
    • Pain Medicine
  • February (5)
    • ALJ Found Scleroderma Disabling
    • More SSD Delays
    • ODAR Rumor
    • SSD Approval Rates
    • National Adjudication Team
  • January (3)
    • Treating Testimony
    • Pontine Stroke
    • SSD Bench Decisions
  • 2016 (44)
  • December (2)
    • What is an Administrative Record?
    • Pain Medicine
  • November (3)
    • SSD Approved in 2 Months
    • Hiring A Vocational Expert
    • VA Rating & SSD
  • October (1)
    • NYSLERS Approval
  • September (6)
    • Second Circuit Case
    • Prudential LTD Fraud
    • District Court Rejects SSA Denial
    • Work Record
    • Macroprolactinoma
    • Jerome Caiati
  • August (5)
    • Importance of Diagnostic Testing
    • SSD Approved In 2 Months
    • Unemployment Benefits Do Not Preclude SSD
    • ALJ Relies On Disgraced “Medical Expert”
    • SSD Approved for Crohn’s Disease
  • July (4)
    • NYSLERS
    • Claimant Credibility and Work History
    • NYS OTDA Fraud Update
    • SSD Approved in Less Than Months
  • June (2)
    • Padro Benefits
    • Social Worker’s Opinion
  • May (7)
    • Combined Disabling Conditions
    • Lymphedema
    • Significant Weight Suffices
    • Combined Disabling Conditions
    • Cancer Claims
    • Deceptive Insurance Practices
    • Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
  • April (3)
    • Kudos To ALJ Wexler
    • Vocational Report Pays Off
    • Holding IMA Accountable
  • March (5)
    • Vocational Expert
    • Easy Case For ALJ
    • SSD Approved in 2.5 Months
    • ALJ Quotas
    • NYSLERS
  • February (3)
    • ALJ Quotas
    • Appealing Partially Favorable SSD Decisions
    • Subpoenas
  • January (3)
    • SSA Self Policing
    • IMA Folly
    • State Agency Fraud
  • 2015 (50)
  • December (1)
    • Sun Life Reverses Denial
  • November (6)
    • DDS Continues to Purge Evidence
    • Proposed LTD Regulations
    • Reliance Approves LTD After Deadline
    • Approval for Toll Collector
    • The Consequences of SSD Delays
    • Acupuncture
  • October (3)
    • Bilateral Manual Dexterity
    • SSD Waiting Times
    • Good News?
  • September (7)
    • SSA Continues Prejudicial Policy
    • Psychotherapy Notes
    • Vocational Evidence Determinative
    • Treating Doctor Testimony
    • IMA Notices
    • SSA Delays
    • SSA INTENTIONALLY INCREASING DELAYS
  • July (3)
    • NYS OTDA Fraud
    • Proper Proffer Procedures
    • Report IMA & DDS Fraud To Inspector General
  • June (2)
    • Undisclosed ALJ Rule
    • SSA Uses Gynecologist To Deny Man’s SSD Claim
  • May (1)
    • Prudential Settles LTD Claim
  • April (2)
    • AMENDING SSD ONSET DATE
    • Padro Benefits
  • March (5)
    • New IMA Fraud & Worse
    • Mental Health Records
    • CROM Testing
    • Padro: Relief too little, too late
    • IMA Evading Law Again
  • February (8)
    • SSD for School Custodian
    • 28 Months For Approval
    • SSD With No Hearing
    • State Agency Analyst Lied
    • Social Security Backlog
    • Social Security Backlog
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Renamed
    • Go Figure
  • January (12)
    • IMA Disability Services
    • Sadistic IMA Conduct
    • A Padro Success
    • Disability for Breast Cancer
    • Continuing Disability Review
    • CIGNA Reverses LTD Termination
    • Disability Hearing Witnesses
    • The State Agency Concedes
    • Social Security Fraud
    • Congress Killing Disability
    • Binder & Binder Bankruptcy
    • SSD In Less Than A Month
  • 2014 (60)
  • December (8)
    • Hearing Wait Gets Worse
    • Internists’ Disability Opinions
    • Binder & Binder Goes Bankrupt
    • SSA Form 821
    • Dementia
    • Sensorineural Deafness
    • CIGNA Says Claimant Cannot Do Any Work
    • Biased SSA Review Policy
  • November (3)
    • Videotaping IMEs
    • Unum Agrees Claimant Can’t Do Any Work
    • Remand Reversal
  • October (5)
    • Pseudarthrosis
    • Proper Hearing Notice
    • Video Taping Consultative Examination
    • Antiphospholipid Syndrome
    • Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
  • September (5)
    • SSA Still Not Using eCAT Properly
    • Supplemental Hearing Cancelled
    • Establishing Mental Disability
    • Passive Income
    • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
  • August (2)
    • IMA Disability Services
    • Federal Court Reverses CIGNA
  • July (3)
    • SSD for RSD
    • State Agency Waste and Delay
    • Lyme Disease
  • June (1)
    • SSD Benefits for Hearing Loss
  • May (6)
    • SSD For Landscaper
    • Disability Retirement Approved Without A Hearing
    • SSD for Cement Truck Driver
    • USDC Reverses ALJ Wolfe
    • Disability Etiology
    • Unum Field Visit
  • April (5)
    • Disability Benefits for Truck Driver
    • Autoimmune Hepatitis
    • Establishing Mental Disability
    • Unum Reapproval
    • Medicaid Disability Determinations
  • March (7)
    • Patchogue Problems Persist
    • Benefits Turned On Vocational Error
    • SSA Staff Attorneys
    • Disability Benefits While Working
    • Scleroderma
    • Agoraphobia
    • Padro Deadline
  • February (4)
    • State Agency Reports Misrepresentations
    • Amending Onset To Avoid Hearing
    • Carpenter Avoids Disability Hearing
    • Brugada Syndrome
  • January (11)
    • Disabling Mitral Valve
    • SSA Secret Rule
    • The Electronic Claims Analysis Tool (eCAT)
    • If You Die Before Benefits Are Approved
    • Media Deception
    • CIGNA Reverses STD & LTD Decisions
    • Disabling Sleep Apnea
    • Padro Settlement Agreement A Joke
    • Appealing Partially Favorable Decisions
    • Social Security in the News
    • Hoppenfeld Refused To Comply With Padro
  • 2013 (84)
  • December (4)
    • CIGNA Loses Standard of Review Motion
    • Prudential Cancels IME
    • Cirrhosis
    • Disability And Work History
  • November (3)
    • Common Sense
    • Pre-onset Medical Evidence
    • Aetna Reverses LTD Termination
  • October (8)
    • Social Security Benefit Increase
    • Reopening Prior Application
    • Wegener's Granulomatosis
    • SSA “Quality” Review By QRB
    • Dire Need
    • Padro Settlement Approved
    • Social Security Increase
    • Government Shutdown
  • September (3)
    • More DDS Waste
    • Fraud In The Social Security Disability process
    • Medical Expert Interrogatories
  • August (12)
    • Reviewing An Employer’s Work Description
    • Podiatrists
    • Off Task
    • Social Security Reconsideration
    • Fully Favorable Decisions
    • Operative Reports
    • Unusual SSD Approvals
    • Risky Side Effects
    • ALJ Strauss Claimants
    • Unsuccessful Work Attempt
    • Unum Pressures Doctors
    • Patchogue Continued Ineptitude
  • July (11)
    • Is Strauss Serious?
    • Is It The New Commissioner?
    • Padro Class Action Problem
    • Padro Class Action Hearing Next Week
    • Replace UNUM
    • Expediting SSD Hearings
    • Court Said IME Doctor Lied
    • Continuing Disability Review
    • Podiatrists
    • Connect The Dots
    • Unum Ordered To Produce Witnesses For Depositions
  • June (5)
    • Social Security Form DDD-3883
    • Acceptable Medical Sources
    • Petition Regulators About Unum
    • Consultative Exam Withdrawn
    • Padro Class Action Notices
  • May (6)
    • Rejecting SSA Remand Offer
    • CIGNA Regulatory Settlement
    • Polymyositis
    • NOSSCR Conference
    • SSA Misinformation
    • Padro Class Action Settlement
  • April (10)
    • DDS Actually Listened
    • Padro Class Action Update
    • Same Day SSD & DI Award
    • SSD for Letter Carrier
    • Illusory Unum Approval
    • Work History & Credibility
    • Lupus
    • Thank You Judge Irizarry
    • Crohn’s’ Disease
    • Work History
  • March (6)
    • Eliminate the SSD Waiting Period
    • Urinary Incontinence
    • SS Retirement or Disability?
    • Ignoring Unreasonable Requests
    • Officer Approved in 2 Months
    • PADRO Class Action
  • February (8)
    • Updating Evidence
    • SSD & Chiropractors
    • SSD Approved In Under 2 Months
    • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
    • Queens ALJ Bias Plaintiff
    • Breast Cancer
    • CIGNA LTD Fraud Template
    • Unsuccessful Work Attempt
  • January (8)
    • Why DDS Denies SSD Claimants
    • Partially Favorable Onset Appeal
    • Treating Physician Rule
    • FCE Spurs Unum Approval
    • Commendable Action By ALJ
    • ERISA Exception
    • Importance of Vocational Evidence
    • State Agency Exam Notices
  • 2012 (87)
  • December (4)
    • SSD Approved In 3 Months
    • Social Security Myth
    • Subpoena Leads to SSD Award for Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Another CE Problem
  • November (4)
    • CIGNA Bad Faith Affirmed
    • Walking Time Bomb
    • Three Heads Are Better Than One
    • Power Restored
  • October (7)
    • Appeals Council Remands
    • Social Security & The Presidential Election
    • SSD Claimants Need To Review Their Efolders
    • Firefighter Awarded SSD
    • Obesity & Disability
    • Videotaping IMA Consultative Examinations
    • Biased Hoppenfeld Decision Reversed
  • September (4)
    • Ileocolic Resection
    • ALJ Bias Overcome
    • Updating Medical Evidence
    • Should I Take Early Retirement?
  • August (9)
    • IMA Disability Services
    • Carpenter Wins SSD For Wrong Reason
    • Padro ALJ Bias Class Action To Be Settled
    • Binder & Binder Replaced
    • If at first …
    • IMA Disability Services
    • The Office of Medical and Vocational Expertise
    • Newsday Article
    • The SSD “12 Month Rule”
  • July (6)
    • Medical Expert Interrogatories
    • Patchogue Ineptitude
    • Emphasizing Work History
    • Reopening Disability Applications
    • What is NY Waiting For?
    • When Objective Evidence Isn't Enough
  • June (10)
    • Disability Benefits For Nurse
    • Bench Decision
    • Hearing Avoided
    • Disability Pension Award From Union
    • IMA Exams In New York
    • AARP On SSD
    • How Much Will Social Security Pay You?
    • SSD & Unemployment Benefits
    • State Agency-IMA Bad Faith Tactics
    • Why Bother With An Exam By IMA?
  • May (14)
    • Workers Compensation & SSD
    • Hoppenfeld Bias
    • Veteran Gets SSD for Memorial Day
    • Vocational Evidence
    • Establishing Mental Disability
    • IMA Exam Is Not Required
    • Postherpetic Neuralgia
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Disabling AION
    • Proof of Birth for SSD
    • Corroboration is not Superfluous
    • Social Security Listings
    • CIGNA CONTINUES ILLEGAL CONDUCT
    • Fast SSD Approvals
  • April (9)
    • Impaired Use of Hands
    • Representative Payee
    • Onset Appeal
    • Amending SSD Onset Date
    • State Agency Vocational Experts
    • Causation and Social Security Disability Benefits
    • Alport Syndrome
    • David Nisnewitz Found Unfit To Be ALJ Again
    • Reopening SSD Applications
  • March (6)
    • Another Example of ALJ Fier's Bias
    • Physician Specialty
    • Medical Source Statements
    • Podiatrists and Disability Benefits
    • Retaining Social Security Experts
    • Transparent Hoppenfeld Bias
  • February (7)
    • State Agency Disability Analysts
    • SSD & WC
    • SSA Should Reimburse Travel
    • Disability Benefits For Carpenter
    • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    • SSD Approved in Two Months
    • Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
  • January (7)
    • Veterans Medical Source Statements
    • Disabled by Schizophrenia
    • Receiving SSD Benefits and an Income
    • Vocational Credibility
    • SSD For Police Officer
    • Kienbock's Disease
    • Patchogue Incompetence
  • 2011 (89)
  • December (4)
    • Binder and Binder
    • Appeals Council Doltishness
    • NYCERS Disability Pension
    • Can You Receive SSD If You Have Income?
  • November (6)
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Multiple Impairments
    • Adverse Evidence
    • Cerebrovascular Accident & SSD
    • Was A Video Hearing Needed?
    • NOSSCR Conference
  • October (7)
    • SSD Approved in 2 Weeks
    • SSD Approved In 2 Months
    • Disability and Diabetes
    • Social Security Benefit Increase
    • Vocational Experts
    • IMA Consultative Examinations
    • Hoppenfeld & The Rotation Policy
  • September (9)
    • Alzheimer’s
    • Federal Court Reassigns Nisnewitz Case
    • Approval After Federal Court Remand
    • Abusive Hoppenfeld Conduct
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SSD Overpayments
    • LTD Approved In Less Than A Month
    • Maximizing Disability Benefits
    • Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
  • August (7)
    • When To Amend The Disability Onset Date
    • Right To Cross Examine Post Hearing Experts
    • Commissioner’s Statement Is Offensive
    • Gilding the Lily
    • SSD Approved in 2.5 Months
    • When to File for SSD
    • Disability & Incontinence
  • July (11)
    • Hoppenfeld Fibromyalgia Bias
    • On The Record Requests
    • LTD Approved In Two Months
    • Work History
    • Relocating While Disabled
    • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    • Getting Disability Benefits Quickly
    • SSD Approved in 3 Months
    • SSD Approved In Two Months
    • SSD & WC Offset
    • Disability Analysts
  • June (7)
    • Federal Court Decision
    • Social Security Depravity
    • Depression and Anxiety
    • Fully Favorable Appeals Council Order
    • Erythema Multiform Major
    • SSD in Three Months
    • Lincoln Life Pays LTD Benefits
  • May (8)
    • Acquiring Work Skills
    • Court Rejects CIGNA LTD Termination
    • Disability Benefits & Substance Abuse
    • Endometriosis
    • SSD Approved In 2 Months
    • Raising The Retirement Age
    • No More Paper Checks
    • Treating Doctors
  • April (11)
    • SSA Prehearing
    • Disability Redefined
    • Consultative Examinations
    • Evidence of Hoppenfeld Bias
    • ALJ Nisnewitz Rejected Again
    • ALJ Bias Class Action
    • Working And SSD
    • ALJ Bias In Queens
    • Federal Court Decision
    • ALJ Strauss Rejected Again
    • Seven Year Wait Over
  • March (8)
    • Lyme Disease
    • ALJ Strauss Reversed Again
    • Remand To A New ALJ
    • “Secret” Child’s Benefits
    • Unfair CIGNA Tactics Detailed
    • LTD Policy Offsets
    • Partially Favorable Decisions
    • SSD While Working
  • February (9)
    • Expediting Disability Benefits
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Date Last Insured
    • Radiculopathy
    • Videoconference Hearings
    • Expediting Disability Benefits
    • Patchogue Incompetence
    • Federal Court Decision
    • Union Disability Approved
  • January (2)
    • Does ALJ Strauss Try To Get Reversed?
    • ALJ Fier Unfit To Rehear Case
  • 2010 (75)
  • December (7)
    • SSA Notice of Awards
    • SSA Doctors
    • Protective Filing Date
    • SSA Delays
    • On The Record Requests
    • Dialysis & Disability
    • Disability Opinions & Medical Tests
  • November (7)
    • LTD and SSD
    • CIGNA Sued For Surveillance
    • Attorney Advisors
    • Social Security Doctors
    • Unum Reverses Termination
    • Electronic Records Express
    • Multiple Impairments
  • October (4)
    • Liver Cancer
    • Unum Approves Fibromyalgia Claim
    • Comorbid Conditions
    • “Partially Favorable” Decisions
  • September (6)
    • Income Doesn't Bar Disability Benefits
    • Celiac Disease
    • Proving Disabling Pain
    • EAJA Fees
    • IMA Disability Services
    • Self Employment
  • August (5)
    • Headaches
    • Ankle Injuries
    • Partially Favorable Decisions
    • Bench Decisions
    • Fibromyalgia
  • July (6)
    • Medical Listing Opinions
    • Treatment Records
    • Avoiding SSD Hearings
    • Federal Court Remand
    • The MTA & SSD
    • When Work Doesn’t Count
  • June (7)
    • Gastroparesis
    • Sjogren's Syndrome
    • Benefits After A Federal Court Remand
    • Firefighter Gets SSD Benefits
    • Prudential Approved LTD, For Now
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
    • Getting Benefits While Working
  • May (7)
    • EAJA Fees
    • Stroke
    • New Jersey District Court Remand
    • District Court Remand
    • ALJ Hoppenfeld Overtly Acts Biased
    • Veterans
    • NYCERS & SSD
  • April (8)
    • Medical Evidence and Functionality
    • Deceptive SSA Notices
    • Onset Date
    • Queens ALJs
    • When Can You File For SSD Benefits?
    • Parkinson’s Disease
    • Consultative Exam (“CE”) Ruled Improper
    • EAJA Fees
  • March (5)
    • Consultative Examinations
    • New Office
    • Complaining About Biased ALJs
    • IMA Disability Services
    • Multiple Impairments
  • February (6)
    • NYCERS
    • Primary Care Physicians
    • Social Security Rulings
    • Anxiety
    • Fibromyalgia
    • Retrospective Medical Opinion
  • January (7)
    • Disability For Federal Employees
    • The Grids
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
    • Adult Disabled Children
    • Charcot-Marie-Tooth
    • Depression and Anxiety
    • RSD/CRPS
  • 2009 (60)
  • December (5)
    • Getting SSD Even If You Can Work
    • Health Insurance For Children
    • Health Insurance For Children
    • Settling With CIGNA
    • Avoiding An Improper Consultative Exam
  • November (5)
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Protective Filing Dates
    • SSD Delays
    • Reopening Past SSD Denial
    • ALJ Strauss’ Reliance On ME Cohen’s Testimony Proves She Is Biased
  • October (7)
    • Listed Impairments
    • Multiple Medical Sources
    • Attorney Advisors
    • Avoiding Consultative Examinations
    • Atypical Parkinson’s
    • Chondromalacia
    • Subpoena The SSA Doctor
  • September (3)
    • Prudential Reverses Fibromyalgia STD & LTD Denial
    • ALJ Nisenewitz: Stupid or Biased?
    • LTD & Health Insurance
  • August (3)
    • Teacher Finally Receives SSD Benefits
    • SSA Consultative Examiners
    • Child’s Benefits
  • July (4)
    • Retrospective Medical Opinions
    • Senior Attorney Adjudicators
    • Medical Improvement
    • Fibromyalgia
  • June (4)
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
    • Dictionary of Occupational Titles
    • Voluntary Remand
    • Subpoena Denials
  • May (5)
    • Courts Rules CIGNA Is Biased
    • SSD & Taxes
    • ALJ Hoppenfeld Must Be Barred From FMS Cases
    • Don’t Believe Everything You Read
    • On The Record Request
  • April (4)
    • Avoiding SSD Remand Hearing
    • NYCERS Disability Retirement
    • Submitting Medical Records
    • CIGNA Ordered To Pay For Its Actions
  • March (9)
    • Oops, CIGNA’s Done It Again
    • Hearing Office Attorneys
    • Hearing Notice
    • Appeals Council Rebukes ALJ Fier
    • Unsuccessful Work Attempts
    • Medical Assessments
    • Disability & Downsizing
    • Consultative Examinations
    • Obama Disability Benefit
  • February (4)
    • SSI Decisions
    • Responsive Doctors
    • Vocational Experts
    • Multiple Sclerosis
  • January (7)
    • Court Blasts CIGNA LTD Benefit Termination
    • Obama and Social Security Benefits
    • “Fully Favorable” Decisions
    • SSD Secret
    • Notice of Dismissal
    • Initial SSA Decisions
    • Appeals Council Scolds ALJ
  • 2008 (70)
  • December (5)
    • Unum Cases In New York
    • Medical Evidence
    • Prior Applications
    • Disability is Functionality
    • Medical Records & Reports
  • November (5)
    • Depression & OCD
    • Overpayment
    • Medical Specialists
    • Best Medical Evidence
    • Appeals Council Remand
  • October (6)
    • Social Security Files
    • Applicaiton Filing Date
    • Representing Yourself
    • Disabled Voters
    • Vertigo
    • Multiple Impairments
  • September (4)
    • Medicare
    • ALJ Hoppenfeld
    • Fibromyalgia
    • Appeals Council Remand
  • August (8)
    • Myasthenia Gravis
    • More Is Better
    • Disability Benefits & Work
    • SSA Medical Reports
    • Negotiating Disability Benefits
    • Consultative Examinations
    • GMA Exposes CIGNA
    • Work History
  • July (6)
    • Onset and Application Dates
    • Supreme Court Helps LTD Claimants
    • Expediting SSD Cases
    • Two Heads Are Better Than One
    • LTD Litigation
    • Retrospective Medical Opinions
  • June (7)
    • Establishing An Onset Date
    • Field Visit
    • Multiple Attorneys
    • Self Employment
    • Special Accommodations
    • Multiple Disability Benefits
    • Clarifying Objective Evidence
  • May (3)
    • Unum Games
    • Vocational Evidence
    • Credit Disability Insurance
  • April (7)
    • “Fully Favorable” Decisions
    • Treating Sources
    • SSD & Mental Disability
    • Using Vocational Evidence To Expedite Benefits
    • Attorney Adjudicator
    • Past Earnings
    • Benefits Without A Hearing
  • March (3)
    • Objective Evidence
    • Disability Appeals
    • Police Officer
  • February (9)
    • Irrelevant Medical Conditions
    • Establishing Credibility
    • Medical Updates
    • No Health Insurance
    • Application Dates
    • Possible Delay Remedy
    • Unum Reassessment Loophole
    • Benefits Despite Income
    • Consultative Examinations
  • January (7)
    • “Accentuate The Positive, Eliminate The Negative”
    • Dire Need
    • How To Avoid Hearing Delays
    • Police Disability
    • Seminar
    • Expediting LTD Benefits
    • Uveitis
  • 2007 (58)
  • December (7)
    • TBI and Vocational Evidence
    • Failure To Receive Notice
    • Mental Disorders
    • Inability To Speak English
    • Discovery In ERISA Cases
    • Don’t Be Intimidated By DDS
    • Multiple Sclerosis
  • November (7)
    • Avoiding Hearings
    • Working Does Not Preclude Benefits
    • Be Wary of Forms
    • Exam Secrets
    • SSD for Firefighter
    • Consultative Examinations
    • Purpose of SSD Hearing
  • October (6)
    • Why Wait?
    • Insurance Department Complaint
    • Overreach For Disability Retirement
    • Vertigo
    • No Objective Testing Required for Chronic Fatigue
    • Non-binding Disability Decision
  • September (3)
    • Always Review Your File
    • Vocational Evidence & Credibility
    • The More The Merrier
  • August (5)
    • Always Check The Listings
    • LTD & SSD
    • Avoid Early Retirement
    • Getting Benefits Faster
    • Medical Records & Reports
  • July (3)
    • Discovery in LTD Cases
    • Constant Vigilance
    • Judges Are Fallible
  • June (4)
    • Clerical Mistakes
    • Needless Forms
    • Objective Evidence of Pain
    • The SSA & The Self Employed Claimant
  • May (2)
    • POMS For Mental Impairment Claims
    • Don’t Be Misled By A Biased Judge
  • April (4)
    • LTD Plan Limitations
    • Faster Benefit Approval
    • LTD Approval Letters
    • Surprise Disability Benefits
  • March (7)
    • Corroborating Physicians
    • Unemployment Benefits
    • Miano v. Barnhart
    • Benefits Despite Working
    • Work History Credibility
    • Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
    • Arthritis Foundation
  • February (10)
    • CHANGE TO ANY OCCUPATION
    • The Law Offices of Jeffrey Delott Disability Law Archive
    • Biased ALJ
    • Memory Problems & File Surprise
    • Welcome to The Law Offices of Jeffrey Delott.
    • FAST SSD Hearing
    • Botta v. Barnhart
    • FERS Reconsideration
    • Benefits While Working
    • Traumatic Brain Injury Program

    DISCLAIMER
    This website provides general information on disability law topics as a public service. Information is intended to be as accurate and current as possible, but should not be relied on as legal advice. No attorney/client relationship is created by viewing or using the content on this website. Each legal problem is different, and past performance does not guarantee future results. You should not act on any of the information contained in this site without first consulting legal counsel, which is why readers are advised to seek experienced legal representation in connection with disability related issues. Our Internet links are not associated with us, and we do not guarantee the accuracy of, any information contained in any link.

    • HOME
    • ABOUT
    • RESOURCES
    • DISABILITY CLAIM FAQ
    • SERVICES
    • CIGNA
    • TESTIMONIALS
    • CONTACT
    • CLIENT RIGHTS

    Attorney Advertising
    Copyright © 2021, Law Offices of Jeffrey Delott

    Site Powered By: WebDesignYou